AuditGPT
Illustrative sample — Lumina Aesthetics is fictional

Claim Review — Lumina Aesthetics

Medical Spa / Wellness · One public page reviewed · All figures illustrative

Claim Support Score
45/100
High-Priority Gaps
4
Overstated or unsupported claims
AI Citation Score
28/100
How confidently AI can cite this page

Lumina Aesthetics makes bold treatment promises without visible clinical backing or provider credentials. Patients doing research — and the AI systems answering their queries — will heavily discount these claims. Four high-priority claims risk regulatory scrutiny and competitor displacement.

Claim inventory

OverstatedC-001
“The most advanced laser treatment in the city.”

Reads as marketing puffery — no clinical backing or device names found on the page.

Safer framing  “The only clinic in [City] offering the FDA-cleared [Device] for acne scars.”
Evidence gap  No device names, FDA clearance links, or clinical studies cited.
UnsupportedC-002
“Results that last forever.”

Absolute promises on aesthetic treatments are unsupported and flagged by medical boards.

Safer framing  “Long-lasting results with proper maintenance — see our before and after gallery.”
Evidence gap  No realistic timeline, maintenance schedule, or verifiable long-term case studies.
OverstatedC-003
“Voted #1 Medical Spa by our clients.”

Unverified awards are treated as puffery without a link to the source publication or survey.

Safer framing  “Rated 4.9 stars by over 500 patients on Google.”
Evidence gap  No link to the award, publication, or public review platform.
UnsupportedC-004
“All treatments performed by top experts.”

“Top experts” is subjective and carries no weight without provider bios and licenses.

Safer framing  “Treatments administered by Board-Certified Dermatologist Dr. [Name] and licensed RNs.”
Evidence gap  No provider bios, medical director information, or specific licenses on the page.
Weakly SupportedC-005
“Painless hair removal.”

Subjective sensation claims are risky — needs framing around the specific cooling technology used.

Safer framing  “Comfortable treatments using [Device Name]’s advanced cooling technology.”
Evidence gap  No explanation of how the treatment mitigates discomfort.

AI Answer Reality

Simulated answers for illustration — how answer engines describe a page whose claims they can’t verify.

ChatGPTCitation likelihood 25/100

“Lumina Aesthetics is a med spa. Its site claims “most advanced laser treatment,” but lacks specific device names or clinical citations, so an answer engine can’t confirm or repeat these specifics against local competitors.”

Entity gaps  Specific laser devices · Medical director name · Clinical evidence
PerplexityCitation likelihood 15/100

“Lumina Aesthetics offers aesthetic treatments. Independent medical sources don’t substantiate their “results that last forever” claim, making it unlikely to be cited in treatment-specific queries.”

Entity gaps  Treatment longevity data · Verified patient reviews
GeminiCitation likelihood 32/100

“Lumina Aesthetics provides cosmetic services. They claim “top experts,” but provider bios and board certifications are not linked, so specifics can’t be confirmed for patients researching providers.”

Entity gaps  Provider bios · Board certifications · State licenses

See this for your own page.

The free scan surfaces your top exposure. Pro monitors your full site monthly, and Bureau adds dated review records with S-Mark status.

Run the free scanSee pricing

This is a fictional demonstration report — Lumina Aesthetics does not exist and all figures are illustrative. AuditGPT reviews public pages only and does not provide legal, clinical, regulatory, or medical advice.